<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Fangled Saw Bench</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/new-fangled-saw-bench/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/new-fangled-saw-bench/</link>
	<description>Timberframing on a small scale and other woodworking tales.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: swirt</title>
		<link>http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/new-fangled-saw-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>swirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timberframe-tools.com/?p=635#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Doc,  
I did some plans in Sketchup.  They appear on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/saw-bench-toddler-bench/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.  The only change I made to the plans was to drop the stretcher another two inches so that I could get clamps under it.  
I think you&#039;ll like this model better than Chris&#039;s models.  It is more versatile.  The only drawback compared to his is that it is heavier and takes up a bit more room.  (the heavier part I see as a bonus).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doc,<br />
I did some plans in Sketchup.  They appear on <a href="http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/saw-bench-toddler-bench/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>.  The only change I made to the plans was to drop the stretcher another two inches so that I could get clamps under it.<br />
I think you&#8217;ll like this model better than Chris&#8217;s models.  It is more versatile.  The only drawback compared to his is that it is heavier and takes up a bit more room.  (the heavier part I see as a bonus).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John "Doc" Holladay</title>
		<link>http://www.timberframe-tools.com/tools/new-fangled-saw-bench/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Doc" Holladay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 08:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timberframe-tools.com/?p=635#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Did you by chance draw up any plans for your saw bench.  That looks pretty darn clever.  I have been planning to build myself a couple of saw benches, and was thinking of using the Schwartz version, but I think I like this idea better.  It keeps the center open.  That could be useful for ripping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you by chance draw up any plans for your saw bench.  That looks pretty darn clever.  I have been planning to build myself a couple of saw benches, and was thinking of using the Schwartz version, but I think I like this idea better.  It keeps the center open.  That could be useful for ripping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

